Concept
Anti-islanding detection methods
- ID
concept:anti-islanding-detection-methods
- IRI
https://solarlattice.org/kb/concept/anti-islanding-detection-methods
- Status
- active
- Also known as
- active frequency shift, Sandia frequency shift, impedance measurement, passive islanding detection, islanding detection, island detection, frequency shift, active anti-islanding
- Category
- Grid
- Concept kind
- technology
Anti-islanding detection methods are how an inverter senses that the utility is gone, so it can stop feeding a section of grid that has been cut off. The risk is highest when the load in the cut-off section roughly matches the power the PV or battery system is feeding in at that moment. Active methods, such as Sandia Frequency Shift, apply a small, continuous disturbance to the inverter output. While the grid is present, the disturbance has no effect on it. In one vendor's version, the inverter adds a little reactive power, which acts as a phase shift. Positive feedback then pushes the frequency up or down until a frequency trip limit is reached, but only if the grid is absent. Passive methods leave the grid alone and only watch it. For example, they trip when the frequency changes by a set amount within a set time. IEEE 1547 and UL 1741 require islanding detection and test for it, but they do not say how detection must work, so vendor schemes vary and can interfere with each other. Ride-through functions mean low voltage can no longer be used to detect an island. Direct transfer trip is a communications-based fallback when inverter detection is not enough.
<!-- review notes
- sentence 2: support check: partial - Passages say islanding can occur when the load roughly equals feed-in power, but they don't say the risk is 'highest' then.
- sentence 3: support check: partial - Passages say the active method has no impact on an intact grid, but the 'continuous disturbance' is only stated for Group 1 (Group 2A is stepped) and 'small' is only given for CPS's reactive injection.
-->
Claims
related_to
c1 drafted · lead
Anti-islanding
Detection methods are the mechanisms inverters use to carry out the anti-islanding function.
c2 verified · fact
Islanding
Unintentional islands can form when the load in the disconnected section roughly matches the PV or storage feed-in power.
verified by: review-workflowverified on: 2026-10-24
c3 drafted · lead
IEEE 1547 proposed
IEEE 1547 sets the island detection requirements but does not specify the detection mechanism, so vendor schemes vary and are often proprietary.
c4 drafted · lead
UL 1741 proposed
UL 1741 listing includes an unintentional islanding test of the inverter.
c5 drafted · lead
Sandia National Laboratories
Several common active methods are named after Sandia: Frequency Shift, Voltage Shift and Impedance Shift. A Sandia report also defines the method groups used in utility questionnaires.
review note: support check: partial - Passages show Sandia Frequency Shift and the Sandia report groups, but Sandia Voltage Shift and Impedance Shift appear only as named options in a questionnaire, not as common methods.
c6 drafted · lead
Frequency trip
In the frequency-shift method, positive feedback pushes the frequency until it reaches the low or high frequency trip limit, and the inverter then disconnects.
c7 drafted · lead
Low-voltage ride-through
Ride-through means low voltage can no longer be used to detect an island, which may make an unintentional island more likely.
c8 drafted · lead
Direct transfer trip proposed
A communications-based alternative when inverter anti-islanding is missing or not sufficient. It is often expensive because it needs protection-grade communication channels.
c9 drafted · lead
Tesla Megapack 2 proposed
Uses active Sandia Frequency Shift anti-islanding and trips within 2 seconds of the island forming.
review note: support check: partial - The passage says Megapack uses active Sandia Frequency Shift and trips within 2 s, but it doesn't name the Megapack 2 model specifically.
c10 drafted · lead
Tesla Megapack 2 XL proposed
Uses active Sandia Frequency Shift anti-islanding.
review note: support check: partial - The passage covers Megapack generally with active SFS, without naming the 2 XL model specifically.
c11 verified · fact
Tesla Powerpack 2 proposed
Uses active Sandia Frequency Shift anti-islanding.
verified by: review-workflowverified on: 2026-10-24review note: support check: partial - The passage gives active SFS for 'the inverter' without naming Powerpack 2.
c12 drafted · lead
Sunny Boy Smart Energy US-50
Its active anti-islanding method is frequency shift.
c13 drafted · lead
Sunny Central UP-US
Can be ordered with passive islanding detection based on rate of frequency change. This function is not UL-certified.
review note: support check: partial - The passage supports optional passive detection based on rate of frequency change and no UL certification, but it doesn't name Sunny Central UP-US.
c14 drafted · lead
CPS SCA100K-T-US-480 / SCA50K-T-US-208
Uses the Group 2A islanding detection method with a stepped perturbation. Other CPS three-phase models use Group 1 with a continuous perturbation.
c15 drafted · lead
CPS SCH200K-T-US-480 / SCH250K-T-US-600
Uses the Group 2A islanding detection method with a stepped perturbation.
Referenced by
Data