Solar Lattice

Stressor

Transport damage

ID
stressor:transport-damage
IRI
https://solarlattice.org/kb/stressor/transport-damage
Status
active
Also known as
transportation/handling errors

Transport damage is mechanical harm done to modules by vibrations and shocks while they are shipped, and it can break the front glass or crack cells inside the laminate. Common causes are a module falling over, a pallet that is not stiff enough touching the bottom module, and transport corners so tight that a module lifts and drops when the one above it is removed. Someone stepping on a module is another cause. Cells can crack even during normal transport in well-designed containers. Broken glass is easy to trace back to transport, but transport cell cracks are usually not visible. A power check right after the damage often misses them, so electroluminescence or lock-in thermography is needed to find them. Cells cracked in transport or a backsheet damaged in handling can later combine with shading, open bypass diodes or reverse current. Parts weakened this way can break and overheat, which leaves burn marks. In a lab truck transport simulation, a few modules showed single cell cracks, but the power loss at STC was small. To reduce exposure, avoid mechanical stress during transport and installation and keep watch on cracked modules in case the cracks spread. Also look for handling as a root cause when you find broken glass. Inspect equipment for shipping damage as soon as it arrives. If rough handling is evident, file a claim with the carrier right away.

Claims

typical_power_loss

c1 drafted · lead ≤ 1.5 PERCENT

Conditions: Maximum Pmax change after truck transport simulation (ASTM D4169/4728) of two complete module shipping stacks

resulted in changes of the electrical power at a maximum degradation of ΔpMAX= 1.5%

review note: support check: partial - Passage gives a maximum degradation of 1.5% after transport simulation of two stacks, but this is a maximum, not a 'typical' value.

c2 verified · fact ≤ 2.8 PERCENT

Conditions: Pmax degradation after transport simulation followed by environmental tests (100 thermal cycles and dynamic wind loads)

Lab test sequence, not field data; the follow-on tests did not worsen the mechanical failures from transport.

verified by: joshuahamsaverified on: 2026-10-20review note: support check: partial - Passage says power degradation up to 2.8% after transport plus thermal cycling and dynamic loads, and that the follow-on tests did not worsen mechanical failures, but it is an upper bound and not a typical value; the 'lab test, not field' note is implied.

Referenced by

Data