Solar Lattice

Measurement

Long-term normalized output decline

ID
meas:normalized-output-decline
IRI
https://solarlattice.org/kb/meas/normalized-output-decline
Status
active
Also known as
Performance Loss Rate, PLR

This signature is a slow drop in plant output over months or years, after the output has been normalized for irradiance. The decline is usually expressed as a performance loss rate in percent per year, either as a single linear rate or as rates over several time segments. The trend includes permanent module degradation as well as losses that can be reversed or avoided with good O&M. With granular dust soiling, normalized output falls during dry periods while the plant stays online, then recovers partly or fully after rain or washing. Before blaming soiling, rule out availability losses, clipping, curtailment and irradiance sensor problems, then compare the trend with soiling station data, rainfall, cleaning logs and reference blocks. When modules age at different rates, the extra mismatch can make system degradation higher than the nameplate module degradation rate. To separate average module degradation from mismatch-driven loss, compare the long-term normalized output with string or inverter trends, IV curve data and module test results. Clean and filter the data carefully, because the filtering choices change the result: high irradiance threshold filters tend to give a lower reported loss rate.

<!-- review notes

Signals

Monitoring channels where this signature appears, named by SunSpec model point.

PointUnitPattern
model_103.WHW-HRweather-normalized yearly energy declines more than module warranty degradation implies
model_403.InDCAAstring currents spread apart over years as weaker modules limit strings
model_302.POAIW-PER-M2used as the irradiance reference for normalization
model_103.WWIrradiance-normalized AC power falls steadily across dry days
model_307.RainMilliMNo rainfall during the declining period

Claims

degradation_rate

c1 verified · fact 1–2 PERCENT-PER-YR

Conditions: First-year drop that yield assessors generally assumed in long-term yield predictions, per a PVPS Task 13 expert survey

This is a modelling assumption, not a field measurement.

verified by: review-workflowverified on: 2026-10-20review note: possible conflict with c2 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c3 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c4 (same source; check the conditions)

c2 verified · fact 0.5–0.7 PERCENT-PER-YR

Conditions: Annual rate that yield assessors assumed after the first year and up to year 5 in long-term yield predictions (PVPS Task 13 survey)

This is a modelling assumption.

verified by: review-workflowverified on: 2026-10-20review note: possible conflict with c1 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c4 (same source; check the conditions)

c3 drafted · lead 0.3–0.5 PERCENT-PER-YR

Conditions: Annual rate that yield assessors assumed from year 5 up to year 30 in long-term yield predictions (PVPS Task 13 survey)

This is a modelling assumption.

review note: possible conflict with c1 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c4 (same source; check the conditions)

c4 verified · fact nominal 0.25 PERCENT-PER-YR

Conditions: Low overall performance loss rate that some yield assessors use for crystalline silicon PV systems

The source says there is no consensus on which proxy value to use.

verified by: review-workflowverified on: 2026-10-20review note: possible conflict with c1 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c2 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c3 (same source; check the conditions)

typical_power_loss

c5 verified · fact 0.3–1 PERCENT

Conditions: Initial light-induced degradation term that some yield assessors add; it depends on module technology and location

verified by: review-workflowverified on: 2026-10-20

Referenced by

Data