Concept
Mismatch loss
- ID
concept:mismatch-loss
- IRI
https://solarlattice.org/kb/concept/mismatch-loss
- Status
- active
- Also known as
- module mismatch, string mismatch, electrical mismatching, Mismatch
- Category
- Modules
- Concept kind
- electrical
Mismatch loss is power lost because the modules in a string do not all have the same current-voltage characteristics, so their small differences in performance cost power. Because of this, the maximum output of the whole array is always lower than the sum of each module's maximum output. A slightly weaker module limits the string current and pulls the stronger modules away from their best operating point. Very weak modules or substrings get bypassed, and all of their power is lost. Mismatch is one of the capture losses. Yield models usually apply a module mismatch factor of about 0.98. Modules can become mismatched when they degrade at different rates, so system degradation can be higher than the degradation of the modules themselves. Floating PV and bifacial modules tend to have more mismatch, partly because modules moving with the waves change tilt and azimuth within a string. Power optimisers and other module-level power electronics reduce mismatch by tracking the maximum power point of each module. In the field, mismatch can be found with string-current comparisons on combiner monitoring, or with module-level mismatch reports. In those reports, mismatch beyond plus or minus 6 percent, or a sudden increase, calls for investigation.
<!-- review notes
- sentence 3: support check: partial - Passages say slightly lower modules limit string current, forcing lower operating point for others, and weak modules/substrings are bypassed losing all power; 'best operating point' is paraphrase, fine, but is from floating PV context only.
- sentence 4: support check: partial - Capture loss and 0.98 factor are stated, but 'yield models usually apply' is not explicitly stated; the sources show a 0.98 typical value.
- sentence 4: review: partial - IEA lists electrical mismatching as a capture loss, and two tables give 0.98 as the typical mismatch factor, but no passage says yield models usually apply it (the IEA table is of factors observed in the field).
-->
Claims
typical_power_loss
c1 verified · fact
≥ 2 PERCENT
Conditions: Loss in system power from module-to-module performance inconsistencies, as stated in an IEA PVPS overview of typical losses
verified by: review-workflowverified on: 2026-10-24
c2 drafted · lead
0.97–0.99, nominal 0.98 UNITLESS
Conditions: Mismatch loss factor (multiplier) observed in the field: typical 0.98, low 0.97, high 0.99
Value is a derate factor, not a percentage loss.
degradation_rate
c3 drafted · lead
nominal 0.1 PERCENT-PER-YR
Conditions: Approximate allowance some independent engineers add to the module degradation rate to cover mismatch from modules degrading at different rates; a modeling allowance, not a universal rule
part_of
c4 drafted · lead
Array capture loss
Electrical mismatching is listed among the causes of capture losses.
explains
c5 drafted · lead
System Degradation vs Module Degradation
Uneven module degradation creates extra mismatch, so system degradation can exceed module nameplate degradation.
related_to
c6 drafted · lead
Module-level power electronics
Module-level MPPT with optimisers reduces mismatch losses.
c7 drafted · lead
Bypass diode
Low-power modules or substrings can be bypassed, losing all their power.
c8 drafted · lead
Floating PV
Relative module movement on water changes tilt and azimuth within a string and increases mismatch.
c9 drafted · lead
Bypass Diode Failure
review note: support check: partial - Bypass diode failure entry is tagged 'module mismatch' and mentions upstream mismatch drivers, but the relation to mismatch loss is only loosely implied.
Data