Solar Lattice

Measurement

Snow-aligned production residual

ID
meas:snow-production-residual
IRI
https://solarlattice.org/kb/meas/snow-production-residual
Status
active
Also known as
Snow cover loss, winter residuals, SCADA production residuals

This signature is a shortfall between measured production and expected snow-free production that lines up in time with snowfall and snow on the modules. The plant can be available, and irradiance sensors can show usable resource, while snow-covered modules still produce little or no current. The loss often appears suddenly after snowfall, then fades gradually as the snow melts or slides off. Partial clearing can leave string and substring currents uneven, so the residual does not always scale with how much snow you can see. To confirm it, line up the SCADA residuals with timestamped snowfall, snow depth, temperature, wind and plane-of-array irradiance, plus camera, drone or field observations; a heated POA pyranometer helps provide the irradiance reference. Not every winter residual is snow: filter out cold-weather inverter behavior, clipping, curtailment, trackers frozen in stow, iced sensors and albedo effects before estimating the loss. If measured recovery after snow is slower than the energy model assumes, the model's snow-loss factor may need revising even when the equipment is working normally.

Signals

Monitoring channels where this signature appears, named by SunSpec model point.

PointUnitPattern
model_103.WWabrupt drop after snowfall, gradual recovery during melt
model_302.POAIW-PER-M2usable irradiance reported while output stays low
model_303.TmpBOMDEG_Cmodule temperature used alongside residuals to follow melt
model_307.TmpAmbDEG_Ccold conditions that slow snow clearing

Claims

typical_power_loss

c1 verified · fact ≤ 10 PERCENT

Conditions: Yearly snow losses for standard framed modules at latitudes above 60°N in Sweden; 'most often' less than this

verified by: joshuahamsaverified on: 2026-10-20review note: support check: partial - Passage says losses are 'most often less than 10%' yearly; the statement frames this as 'up to 10%' typical, which is roughly equivalent but an upper bound rather than typical.; possible conflict with c2 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c3 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c4 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c7 (same source; check the conditions)

c2 verified · fact nominal 18 PERCENT

Conditions: Annual production loss, snow-covered vs cleaned modules side by side, Sierra Mountains USA, 0° tilt (Powers et al.)

verified by: joshuahamsaverified on: 2026-10-20review note: possible conflict with c1 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c3 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c4 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c5 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c7 (same source; check the conditions)

c3 verified · fact nominal 15 PERCENT

Conditions: Annual production loss, snow-covered vs cleaned modules, Sierra Mountains USA, 24° tilt (Powers et al.)

verified by: joshuahamsaverified on: 2026-10-20review note: possible conflict with c1 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c2 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c4 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c5 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c7 (same source; check the conditions)

c4 verified · fact nominal 12 PERCENT

Conditions: Annual production loss, snow-covered vs cleaned modules, Sierra Mountains USA, 39° tilt (Powers et al.)

verified by: joshuahamsaverified on: 2026-10-20review note: possible conflict with c1 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c2 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c3 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c5 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c7 (same source; check the conditions)

c5 verified · fact 0.3–2.7 PERCENT

Conditions: Annual snow-cover losses, grid-connected frameless modules at 28° tilt, Bavaria, southern Germany

verified by: joshuahamsaverified on: 2026-10-20review note: possible conflict with c2 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c3 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c4 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c7 (same source; check the conditions)

c6 verified · fact ≤ 100 PERCENT

Conditions: Daily loss from snow cover, Konya, Turkey, January 2017, cleaned vs snow-covered modules

Source says daily losses could be almost 100%

verified by: joshuahamsaverified on: 2026-10-20review note: support check: partial - Passage says daily losses could be almost 100% in Konya Jan 2017; 'typical' up to 100% is slightly overstated but the note acknowledges it.

c7 verified · fact nominal 23 PERCENT

Conditions: Monthly loss from snow cover, Konya, Turkey, January 2017

verified by: joshuahamsaverified on: 2026-10-20review note: possible conflict with c1 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c2 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c3 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c4 (same source; check the conditions); possible conflict with c5 (same source; check the conditions)

Referenced by

Data